Now, if we can only get a story that isn't a heaving mound of cliches and actors who can act, these might be more than effects showcases. Fingers crossed.
Now, if we can only get a story that isn't a heaving mound of cliches and actors who can act, these might be more than effects showcases. Fingers crossed.
However, it is important to note that not only has Sony decided not to release the film to theaters but won't release it in any format. The Interview is going to be placed in a deep dark vault in Sony's headquarters. It is important that we see this not just as an attack on a movie studio or a multi-national corporation; it is an attack on the Free World. It is imperative that the United States take action against North Korea. Not military action, of course; but a retaliatory cyber-attack against North Korean assets would be appropriate. Also, the Senate should immediately pass HR 1771 (which will expand sanctions against North Korea) and the President should sign it.
North Korea has successfully intimidated Sony; a failure to act would mean it has also successfully intimidated the Free World.
Incidentally, I have no idea whether this movie would be any good; but it has now become a symbol of the clash between freedom and tyranny. Well done, Pyongyang, you've just elevated what probably is a mediocre comedy full of sex and dick jokes to the level of an embattled work of art.
Sources: New York Times, Ares Technica, Rolling Stone
Called the GhostSwimmer, the drone uses the streamlined shape of a shark to cut through the water. It also propels itself with a tail, swimming like a real shark. Assuming it moves forward from the testing phase to some sort of future production model, it will join other aquatic drones to replace the dolphins and other marine animals the US Navy has used for mine clearance and harbor protection. Also, unlike the marine animals which require significant amounts of care and can only be deployed by specialized units, UUVs (Unmanned Underwater Vehicles) can be used by any ship. We could soon see a Navy consisting of a small number of large, manned platforms (i.e., ships) serving as hosts to hundreds of drones, used in the air, on the surface and underwater. This may also help us get past the increasing expense of manned platforms, allowing us to concentrate on a few highly survivable ships using swarms of drones for offensive and defensive operations.
This is the future of the US military; an arsenal of robots, precision strike weapons and a comparative small number of battle managers and special forces operators for environments where you need a person with a gun.
Or with SkyNet...AAAAHHHH!!!!
Source: Wired
For me, the icing on this cliche cake, however, is the conclusion in which Four (Theo James) is brainwashed and told to kill Tris (Woodley). It has been established that the society of this dystopic future world can mentally condition people into becoming murderous killers and that there is no way to break the conditioning. However, after Four looks into Tris's blank, watery eyes, that somehow destroys the conditioning. Our heroes then fight off 50 million trained killers, effortlessly destroy society and ride off into the sunset...or something like that. By the time I got to the conclusion, I was bored I may have fallen asleep. Or entered an auto-hypnotic trance. One of those.
The explanation, that Four's conditioning is broken because he is afraid of looking in the face of someone he is about to kill - or some such nonsense - makes zero sense. Does that mean if I, with my fear of spiders, was subject to this conditioning, but that saw a daddy longlegs on the floor, I would snap out of it? At the same time, it is also completely predictable. We know that our Teen-Beat cover model protagonists are not going to kill each other. So, having Four stick a gun in Tris's face holds no tension. Why even bother?
It's not that I'm opposed to happy endings. I generally expect - and accept - that the protagonists will triumph. However, creating false tension this way is terrible story-telling. It is made worse when the event that defuses the tension is so idiotic.
Tom Hardy looks appropriately stoic as Max.
Check out the trailer below and prepare to enter "A World Without Hope."
The casting of Chadwick Boseman doesn't do much for me; I've haven't seen any of the movies he has been in. I probably caught him on TV - he was in an episode of Fringe - but don't recall seeing him. He did drop an interesting tidbit in a recent interview. While it was known that the character was going to be in the next Captain America movie, Boseman mentions that he will be in "movies" before Black Panther. Could we get a post-credit teaser in Age of Ultron? Will BP show up in one of the other Marvel films before his stand alone movie? We do have Doctor Strange, Guardians of the Galaxy 2, and Thor: Ragnarok all hitting screens in the next couple of years. While I have a hard time picturing a Guardians cross-over, both Doc Strange and Thor are possibilities.
Anyway, every decision I hear coming out of Marvel seems to be a good one, at least when it comes to their movies. You can check out more on this story at Jo Blo.
Here's the film:
Wanderers - a short film by Erik Wernquist from Erik Wernquist on Vimeo.